• boonhet@lemmy.zipBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      55/60 for women/men but the pension wasn’t exactly high. Life expectancy 65 for men, 74 for women. Population was still growing too. Retirement as a concept requires enough young people to serve the needs of the old.

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      Nah fuck that you prove to me humanity can do an economy properly than we have a conversation. At this point we will all die before we ever have a proper economy. The greed of the few out weigh the needs of the many.

        • qarbone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Oh, dearie me, a pure seeker of knowledge. Sorry, it’s just that no one had mentioned the Soviet Union. And people usually bring up things that read like non-sequiturs when they want to establish a connection.

          And I didn’t downvote. Yet. I usually wait to downvote until a commenter leaves little doubt that they’re a dickhead.

    • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.mlBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Let’s do a better example, how much did living standards, health, happiness, and retirement age improve when socialism was implemented and monarchism was pushed out? How much did those metrics fall when capitalism was introduced?