The title is pure clickbait, but the article is nuanced and reasonably well written, IMO.
No one wants a freaking Ubuntu chatbot on their desktop, but code submission is an entirely different issue, and I think “the submitter is entirely responsible for their code” is a very reasonable position.
And obviously, LLM-generated code policy needs to be tuned to each project and their contributor community. As an example not cited in the article, vibe-coded PRs are an ongoing plague for llama.cpp, an LLM inference engine itself, so they blanket ban them. Ironic, and perfectly reasonable. But Linus researching that Intel bug with a little help, but using his brain for the legwork and actual submission, is also reasonable.
Haiku, anyone?
Are you asking for a poem, or suggesting the BeOS based OS?
I’m suggesting the BeOS successor.
Thank you for clarifying. It needs better software, but I used Haiku as a primary OS for a month a few years back. I was able to dig out old games and play them, so no major complaints here.
