sanitation@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoNew compression techniquelemmy.todayimagemessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up178arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1imageNew compression techniquelemmy.todaysanitation@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square73linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarehirihit640@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoBut they could probably get 90% the way there with just DNA. I think that was the point.
minus-squareonlinepersona@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoNo, they couldn’t, that’s what’s being said. If you have a huge state machine with billions of parameters, toggling a different subset can yield wildly different results.
minus-squarehirihit640@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoBut there are examples of twins who grew up apart and still look almost identical
minus-squareSusaga@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoThey said “perfectly”, not “90%”. You’re trying to move the goalposts.
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoMaybe if you mean things like two eyes, two hands, two feet, one nose, but not in any details
minus-squarehirihit640@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWell it would be as accurate as, say, twins who grew up in separate households look similar to each other
But they could probably get 90% the way there with just DNA. I think that was the point.
No, they couldn’t, that’s what’s being said. If you have a huge state machine with billions of parameters, toggling a different subset can yield wildly different results.
But there are examples of twins who grew up apart and still look almost identical
They said “perfectly”, not “90%”. You’re trying to move the goalposts.
Maybe if you mean things like two eyes, two hands, two feet, one nose, but not in any details
Well it would be as accurate as, say, twins who grew up in separate households look similar to each other