I’m just wondering what the statute of limitations is here. Are you still gonna be in your farewell thread next week? Next month?
I’ll probably check up intermittently as long as it’s active, and when it’s inactive, I won’t be here. Sorry that you think it’s regulated by some law?
Don’t worry, I’ll block you again soon. I know you can’t resist engaging with me.
Cute coming from someone who unblocked me specifically to engage with me. :)
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Typically people leave after saying goodbye but ok.
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Well, when I see you baselessly accuse me of things, I of course reply to defend myself. And then you reply and we get into the whole thing where I keep asking you to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your beliefs, and you reply that one must not test our Lord God the State Department and that blessed is he who believes the US government without having seen and skepticism is the tool of the devil, blah blah blah. And since you can’t seem to resist preaching your holy gospel or chastising the faithless skeptics, I think I’m making it harder for you to abide by your decision to leave. So, for both of our sakes, I will now block you again.
Typically people leave after saying goodbye but ok.
Imagine going to a farewell party and being surprised that the person leaving is attending, lmao.
And then you reply and we get into the whole thing where I keep asking you to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your beliefs, and you reply that one must not test our Lord God the State Department and that blessed is he who believes the US government without having seen and skepticism is the tool of the devil, blah blah blah.
Cute, considering that you’ve been in numerous disputes on that matter, and were provided with reliable sources which you rejected as “Adrian Zenz” despite the fact that the vast majority of the evidence provided in said sourceshad nothing to do with Zenz.
But hey, genocide deniers aren’t here because you listen to evidence. You’re here because you’re fascist bootlickers who love the slaughter of minorities, as long as it’s by ‘your’ camp.
So, for both of our sakes, I will now block you again.
Don’t know why you felt the need to announce that since pretty clearly blocking me is apparently meaningless to you, but okay.
Your “evidence” is The Diplomat lamenting two years ago that the “genocide” was “fading away?” That they were losing the argument?
Keep fighting the good fight. Maybe you can convince Wikipedia to un-step back from its previous accusations. Maybe you can convince the UN to re-open the case they closed on the matter.
“Supporting Nazis is when you acknowledge and oppose genocide” isn’t a new one, but every time a fascist bootlicker like you trots it out, it always astounds me all the same.
I prefer to keep a short blocklist.
I’m just wondering what the statute of limitations is here. Are you still gonna be in your farewell thread next week? Next month?
Don’t worry, I’ll block you again soon. I know you can’t resist engaging with me.
I’ll probably check up intermittently as long as it’s active, and when it’s inactive, I won’t be here. Sorry that you think it’s regulated by some law?
Cute coming from someone who unblocked me specifically to engage with me. :)
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Typically people leave after saying goodbye but ok.
Well, when I see you baselessly accuse me of things, I of course reply to defend myself. And then you reply and we get into the whole thing where I keep asking you to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your beliefs, and you reply that one must not test our Lord God the State Department and that blessed is he who believes the US government without having seen and skepticism is the tool of the devil, blah blah blah. And since you can’t seem to resist preaching your holy gospel or chastising the faithless skeptics, I think I’m making it harder for you to abide by your decision to leave. So, for both of our sakes, I will now block you again.
Imagine going to a farewell party and being surprised that the person leaving is attending, lmao.
Cute, considering that you’ve been in numerous disputes on that matter, and were provided with reliable sources which you rejected as “Adrian Zenz” despite the fact that the vast majority of the evidence provided in said sources had nothing to do with Zenz.
But hey, genocide deniers aren’t here because you listen to evidence. You’re here because you’re fascist bootlickers who love the slaughter of minorities, as long as it’s by ‘your’ camp.
Don’t know why you felt the need to announce that since pretty clearly blocking me is apparently meaningless to you, but okay.
Your “evidence” is The Diplomat lamenting two years ago that the “genocide” was “fading away?” That they were losing the argument?
Keep fighting the good fight. Maybe you can convince Wikipedia to un-step back from its previous accusations. Maybe you can convince the UN to re-open the case they closed on the matter.
You mean this one?
Keep simping for the regime that stonewalls UN investigators; after all, bootlicking is all Nazi scumbags like you know how to do.
Holy projection, maybe you’ll get a job that supports Nazis. I hear ICE is hiring.
“Supporting Nazis is when you acknowledge and oppose genocide” isn’t a new one, but every time a fascist bootlicker like you trots it out, it always astounds me all the same.