• aaa999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    “The leftist who said “My goal is to make sure Grégoire loses” was defeated”

    why do we have these

    there’s another way to phrase “I am going to lose and I want Greg to lose and Donklus is the only other person running”

    glad she didn’t “save Palestine” though gj to the percent of Paris that did the not dumb thing

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      In Italy is the same and it’s one of the reasons we’re getting fascists elected everywhere

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        Tankies are everywhere, especially here on Lemmy. Their main enemy is the center left, just as they always were. Remember that the German communists branded the social democrats as social fascists and considered them almost as bad the literal Nazis.

        • toad@sh.itjust.worksBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 days ago

          The guys who literally collaborated the nazis? No shit

          Beside aren’t you one of them genocide influencer whining about everybody being “antisemite”?

          • qevlarr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            He is, but that isn’t relevant right now. Smearing center left does not help the broader leftist project. It’s always “left unity” when it comes to anarchists and social democrats listening to authoritarian Marxists, but never the other way around. I consider “left unity” an authoritarian dog whistle at this point

    • toad@sh.itjust.worksBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Oh fuck off. French socialists have voted for every liberal bullshit for a decade. The pension reform?

      • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        If you consider the french socialists to be left then… Idk. Maybe you need to curate more what your information sources are.

          • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            They are the biggest player in the left. They want to unify the left around them. Other parties do not want this because they all want to share the pie. I’d say they are the biggest team players and the others are retarded. They twice now took the initiative to rally the entire left around them and yet they are somehow the ones not playing nice.

            • iglou@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              No, they want the other left parties to agree to all their conditions and refuse to compromise on their positions. I’m all for a united left but LFI is a big part of the problem.

              • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                So the biggest player with the most success so far should compromise to the people who wants to push a liberal agenda?

                This makes no sense. You cannot do fuck all for years, loose your base, alienate everybody and then come to say “hey stop bullying me and accept my conditions, also you’re antisemitic, and I hate the way you speak”.

                • iglou@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  Yes, they should compromise. They’re obviously not big enough to win on their own, so they should compromise like all the others. They refuse to do so, and the logical consequence is that other parties refuse to join them.

                  If you think that having more popularity makes them the absolute authority of the left and every other party should bow to their ideas, we have nothing to discuss.

                  They refuse to compromise with parties less liberal than them as well, by the way. They refuse to compromise no matter the agenda.

                  • toad@sh.itjust.worksBanned
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    What specific issues do you think they refuse to compromise on? Islamoleftism? Genocide being bad?

                  • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 days ago

                    You miss the points. To quote someone else “you don’t have the cards”.

                    When your party is irrelevant and you want to push your agenda and slander the other bigger boy, ofc you gonna get bullied. That’s how life works.

            • bearboiblake@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 days ago

              I would have upvoted you til you used an ableist slur. You could have made your argument perfectly well - in fact, even stronger - if you chose a specific word that more closely matches the problem. It isn’t that they’re intellectually disabled, it’s because they are too blinded by ideology to take a pragmatic approach. I’d just say “…the others aren’t pragmatic enough to put aside their differences” or something.

              • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                No. This has nothing to do with pragmatism. This is the fucking ruling class shitting their pants because they fear the loss of their privileges. The PS is nothing more than cockroaches trying everything to keep the little bit of power they have.

                Do you imagine if you had to find a proper job after being an elected PS official for years? What would you out in your CV? Traitor (Faure)? CIA asset (Glucksman)? "I successfully lead a party to its ruin (Holland, Valls)?

                • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Right, okay, that’s fine – my point is that the problem isn’t intellectual disability, and even if it was, you shouldn’t use the r-slur. I am disabled and I have had that word weaponized against me my entire life, and seeing it used brings back memories of all of the times I was bullied and harassed for being different.

                  • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 days ago

                    I can understand this. If it clears things up in my world retarded! = disabled.

                    In my head, retarded is someone who’s purposefully going out if his way to be as stupid as possible. Just like dude or bro is genderless. Idk if this makes sense for you, tho.

                    I’m sorry if you felt attacked. This was not the goal.

                • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  For those with their eyes filled with sawdust: Because he turned into a piece of populistic shit. Also, as you don’t seem to be living in France, for good or bad reasons, loads of people hate him and fear him, and will never ever vote for him.

                  So let’s keep him so that they will never win, right, to own the euh, “hardlibs”, by getting Bardela elected instead. That’ll teach the, euh “hardlibs”.

      • toad@sh.itjust.worksBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Socialists are so left they constantly aligned with macron, an investment banker.

        Please. If you don’t know what you’re talking about just shut up