• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    3 个月前

    Rent freezes make landlords only do the bare minimum maintenance required by the law since they can’t increase rents when doing any remodelling.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 个月前

        Only in rent-controlled markets. In other markets they remodel to jack up the prices, but you would complain about that too

        • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          Anyone with a brainstem would complain about that i think. Though I don’t grant your premise in the absolute least.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 个月前

            So if landlords put more money into renovation it’s bad, if they don’t it’s also bad

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 个月前

      Another way of looking at this is landlords won’t be able to fancy up units and jack up prices which push out low income renters. Also, if landlords can’t make a profit, they will sell which will allow more people to buy rather than be forced to rent. This does decrease the number of rental units in the future which could drive up prices, but it could be combined with a plan to renovate office spaces into apartments to counteract this.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 个月前

        We want landlords to do this to serve the renters that want to pay more. Office spaces will be renovated to make apartments when rents are high enough to pay for this expense. You don’t need a plan when market forces cause people to make sound business decisions.

        The only thing you need to fix is zoning

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          That assumes market forces are doing what you want. There are always levers that can encourage the market to move where you want it to go. For example raising property taxes but giving a 10 year tax break to converted office spaces (and changes to zoning of course).

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 个月前

            That makes markets less efficient in the long run. It might cost less in rent, but your office is far away and you pay for it in commute time. You didn’t even know that in a parallel universe your company moved to a better office space that’s in your city

            • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 个月前

              Efficiency and resilience are opposing forces. Think of the spare tire on a car. Is it efficient to carry around a fifth wheel all the time? No. But it is resilient because it will make it possible to quickly recover from a disruption (i.e. a flat tire).

              The housing system needs a certain degree of resilience or people end up homeless. If that costs landlords money, too damn bad. It’s the job of government to force them.

        • chloroken@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          So you do the bidding of a class you don’t belong to? How fucking sad is that.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 个月前

            So first I’m just a landlord shill, but now that you find out I’m not one I’m doing their bidding? Maybe I just want to have a discussion