Are the terminally online leftists infighting again about inconsequential purity tests instead of uniting in solidarity against the ruling class to try to form a unified movement against the rising fascist tide across the western world?
Ah, I see I’ve hit a nerve. If anybody would like to do actual praxis or start a book club, a good start could be found in the links below.
Are the terminally online leftists infighting again about inconsequential purity tests instead of uniting in solidarity against the ruling class to try to form a unified movement against the rising fascist tide across the western world?
Ah, I see I’ve hit a nerve. If anybody would like to do actual praxis or start a book club, a good start could be found in the links below.
https://www.rosalux.de/en/publication/id/44627/the-new-balkan-left
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-consensus
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-communism-and-anarchy
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/rudolf-rocker-nationalism-and-culture
The left is relative, but leftists are socialists, so no not usually in this case, the Piefed crowd seems mostly liberal.
Leftists are not solely socialist, they can be communist and anarchist as well.
… Those are kinds of socialists
…Yes and nuance is important.
When the point is it’s not leftist infighting but left infighting yes, the point is nuance, but not in the category under discussion.
https://philosophy.idoneos.com/philosophical_problems/socialism_,_communism_and_anarchism/
This might help.
Your ignorance isn’t interesting