A few people pointed out that many rust projects were MIT licensed and since then I indeed have seen MIT licensed projects everywhere in Rust. Then I found the link of this post and it looks like MIT was by far the most popular license in all of opensource in 2023.

Any ideas why?

  • novaTopFlex@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unfortunately, open-source software is quickly being coopted in many communities, particularly due to corporate influences, such as Microsoft (with GitHub, WSL, etc.) or Red Hat (closing down RHEL). Corporations must use open-source, and GPL (which I am a strong believer of, by the way) does not allow most corporations to use the software, as the software must remain free-and-open-source (FOSS).

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not really, you can charge for GPL software, but you must always provide the source and anyone may redistribute those

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      MIT license predates the GPL. Tiny projects like X chose it many decades ago.

      Most Open Source software is written by corporations.

      Probably the largest developer of GPL software is Red Hat. I will avoid responding to the “closing down” of RHEL except to ask how Alma and Rocky are doing. Pretty well I believe.

      Permissive licenses like MIT and Apache require the software to “remain free-and-open-source (FOSS)”. That is “the software” released under those licenses (not some future software that has not been written yet).

      WSL is Open Source.

      But don’t let the facts get in the way.