For example, I don’t use TikTok. I never have, and I never will, and I’d advise everyone else to get off the platform too. I genuinely believe it’s objectively harmful to people’s mental health and possibly even a threat to democracy. That said, I also believe people should be free to decide for themselves whether they want to use it or not, which is why I’m against the U.S. government banning it.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      That goes against your personal preferences?

      • anon
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Step 1: look at the question that this thread is asking

        Step 2: look at my post and pretend that I am providing my answer to it

      • Pyr
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        For me as well at least a little bit. I feel like there should be another option. Doesn’t really sit well with me that a handful of random people can let someone walk free even if they clearly broke the law. It’s unlikely to happen successfully but what if they are all threatened or bribed?

  • Ogmios
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    I think honesty is the best policy even when it sucks for me, because that’s the only way to actually grow and improve myself. The real world is infinite, but lies don’t lead to anything.

    • @Free_Opinions@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      I’m with you on this one. I tell the truth even when it’s potentially harmful to me. However, it also holds you accountable because it prevents one from doing things they would have the urge to lie about in the future.

      Also, not lying doesn’t mean radical honesty. Just that you don’t say things that are untrue. I think lying is only acceptable when used to prevent violence - kind of like violence is also acceptable when defending yourself. So if there are nazies on the door asking wether you have Anne Frank on the attic, it’s okay to lie.

    • JackGreenEarth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      I try to avoid lying, but I’m happy to leave out the truth, or imply a lie without actually saying it if telling the full truth would lead to harm.

    • Pyr
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      I think the usage of all drugs should be legal, but I don’t think the sale or the production of all drugs should be legal.

      Stop arresting people who are addicted to the stuff and just arrest the people who are spreading it around.

      And no arresting people for “intent to sell” just because they have a lot. Do some actual detective work and catch them actually selling it.

      • @Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        The illegality of production and sale makes the drugs far more likely to be adulterated or a concentration other than advertised, which kills people. Prohibition causes black markets, which leads to people resolving disputes through violence since they can’t use the courts.

        Legalization would make all of that go away, almost instantly.

        • Pyr
          link
          fedilink
          04 months ago

          Yes, I omitted that I didn’t think all production should be illegal but it should require standards and permits at least. No one should be producing them in a home made lab for example if they intend to sell it to others and all sales should be through pharmacies and legitimate businesses.

  • @tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    04 months ago

    The democrats are largely controlled by corporate shills but I think if they had like 12 years in office we could wrench the country back on a reasonable path.

  • @twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    04 months ago

    I think many people on here, me included, would rather be using Reddit simply because of all the content.

    • @redditistrash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      Reddit as a site is superior to Lemmy, but ever since all the trash have flooded that place, I decided to leave. What I’m saying is that I would pbviously choose Reddit if we’d ignore the kind of people that are frequenting it, but since you can’t really ignore them when it comes to a social media, I use this site instead.

  • @amzd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -14 months ago

    I would prefer to spend holidays with family but I don’t because they prefer to eat flesh and I am against animal abuse. I think it’s the right thing to do to protest this by not going but it sucks.

    • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      You could choose to subtly influence your relatives, but instead you “protest”. Pfft. Given the vegan I knew well, what you’re actually doing here is not going because you’re too grossed out by it. You know not going won’t inspire anyone to change, but you tell yourself that lie to justify it because being grossed out is not a high minded reason.

      • @amzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I have been requested to not talk about it.

        You know not going won’t inspire anyone to change

        Partner stopped going and the next year all family events were fully vegan because family prefers being together over eating flesh.

    • @Free_Opinions@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      My stance on eating meat is kind of the exact opposite of what I was asking here. It’s one of the two things I continue doing despite not being able to morally justify it. Piracy is the other one.

      • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        both are easy to justify. humans share (food, culture, stories, songs, tools, etc). piracy is natural. laws that prohibit it are immoral.

        as for eating meat, there is cost, convenience, and culture: for many people eschewing meat simply isn’t reasonable given their circumstances.