@vegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 days agoTesla's European car sales nosedive for fifth month as customers switch to Chinese EVswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square216fedilinkarrow-up1877arrow-down112cross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up1865arrow-down1external-linkTesla's European car sales nosedive for fifth month as customers switch to Chinese EVswww.cnbc.com@vegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 days agomessage-square216fedilinkcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squareRazgrizOnelinkfedilinkEnglish14•1 day agoMy dude you can’t admit you didn’t read the article then defend the fact that you didn’t read it like that. Just read it and then comment lol
minus-squareOptionallinkfedilinkEnglish-7•1 day agoMy comment is about the headline. Yes? I read that. Everyone read that. That’s what my comment is referring to.
minus-square@prole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 day agoYou could just say, “you’re right, I probably should have.” Try it sometime, it’s nice.
minus-squareOptionallinkfedilinkEnglish-2•1 day ago“the headline is wrong” Wahhhh you didn’t read the article! “that’s true. you’re right. I probably should have. Where I would then return to the single sentence that I’m referring to and nothing will have changed. Do you even understand what I’m talking about? Because that would be nice.”
My dude you can’t admit you didn’t read the article then defend the fact that you didn’t read it like that. Just read it and then comment lol
My comment is about the headline. Yes?
I read that. Everyone read that. That’s what my comment is referring to.
You could just say, “you’re right, I probably should have.”
Try it sometime, it’s nice.
“the headline is wrong”
Wahhhh you didn’t read the article!
“that’s true. you’re right. I probably should have. Where I would then return to the single sentence that I’m referring to and nothing will have changed. Do you even understand what I’m talking about? Because that would be nice.”