You’re only able to choose two options, how is that democracy? I thought democracy was about being able to choose anyone you think is suitable to be a leader, not one of two pre-selected people. At that point, it’s not much different to a one-party system, just with two people rather than only one person.

  • @jimmy90@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    83 days ago

    that’s why in many european states we’ve evolved to variants of multi party, transferable votes systems

    it still has inherent flaws and it still seems to have 2 sides (one side kinda sorta has to be the majority “in power”, and the others in opposition) but it feels and maybe is more representative of the vote we cast

    • sbirdOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 days ago

      maybe it’s due to the inherent human“us vs them” mentality. the “us vs them” thing really causes a lot of problems :<

      • @jimmy90@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 days ago

        Not so sure about that. It’s adversarial in nature but that’s not a bad thing. It means we keep changing hopefully for the better for everyone