• Monkey With A Shell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    69
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Yay, more space junk, and knowing Google they would abandon the whole thing a couple years in when it gets boring and leave them to rot.

    Edit:not actually sat, which makes it weird to call a ‘starlink competitor’ then, but I don’t write the headlines.

    • pelya
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 day ago
      • They split off from Google.

      • They are not using satellites, they shine a lazer from one fixed tower to another, with range about 20 km.

      • Monkey With A Shell
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1924 hours ago

        Ah, see that’s where not reading is a problem. Just saw star link competitor and remembered something a recently about China looking to launch a similar system.

        Odd they would phrase it as a ‘starlink competitor’ then though rather than ‘a new ISP bid’. Wireless systems with directional antenna relays are not really new, not sure if any use laser particularly but the concept is essentially the same.

        • pelya
          link
          fedilink
          English
          423 hours ago

          Yup. Now we have long-range WiFi filling that niche.

    • @rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      At sufficiently low orbits, the satellites would simply deorbit themselves because of the atmospheric drag. Several Starlink sats have been lost this way.

      • Monkey With A Shell
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 day ago

        Yeah, more thinking the wasted time, resources, and emissions involved in building, launching, managing, and then whenever makes it down.

        Take all that and make something useful instead, whatever happened to Google fiber being built out all over? More reliable, faster, doesn’t involve sending piles of redundant satellites into space…

        • @popcap200@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 day ago

          Supposedly traditional ISP’s have tons and tons of lawyers and filed every single step of the way to stop Google from intruding on their local monopolies.

        • @theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          114 hours ago

          It was more they’re worried it would, because of the sheer scale of metallic satellites that would be burning up in the upper atmosphere

        • @Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          324 hours ago

          When they say “burn up on reentry” they don’t mean disintegrate, they mean burn. It’s exactly like throwing thousands of home entertainment systems in a fire except that the pollution is in the upper atmosphere where normal pollution doesn’t reach.

        • @rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          223 hours ago

          I don’t know about the ozone layer specifically, but reentry turns the satellite into danger dust – mostly metal oxides and burnt polymers. Ozone, being a very strong oxidizer, is the most likely to react with the hot debris, so it probably does damage the ozone layer, but I can’t quantify the damage, or the released pollutants.

    • @sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -212 hours ago

      Completely destroying space and satellite communication might actually be for the best… maybe.