The other day, I made a post about Firefox’s web extensions, specifically for YouTube. A lot of people pointed out Mozilla’s recent TOS update, which pertains to selling personal data. I noticed there were no suggestions, though. What alternative would you suggest, Lemmy?

  • XanthraxOP
    link
    fedilink
    712 days ago

    I was thinking librewolf sounded nice. Especially with baked in security features. When digging for advice, I’ve mostly found people still recommending Firefox over the last year, up until recently. Librewolf popped up a few times, though. The seamonkey internet suite seems pretty nice, as well.

    • ekZepp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      Libre is nice but have some little bug here and there regarding which site you use or your os.

    • Lucy :3
      link
      fedilink
      -112 days ago

      Saying Librewolf is an alternative to FF is like saying Brave is an alternative to Chrome. The only exception that the base of FF is FF and the base of Chrome, where all other Forks are based on, is Chromium.

      The only alternatives are completely independent projects, like Webkit. But they aren’t really suitable for power users.

      • @Rooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        612 days ago

        Yes but they dont have the “issue” with the ai and so on. I still go all in on firefox to be a REAL alternative to anything like colored chromium.

        I would recommend waterfox too, it has some neat theme options. Firefox didnt shit its own base like chromium did with mv3

      • stinerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        312 days ago

        GNOME Web uses WebKit, but I don’t feel like it’s a full-featured browser.

        • Lucy :3
          link
          fedilink
          212 days ago

          Exactly, that’s the problem. We need to either hard fork an earlier version of Gecko/FF or put a lot more resources and effort into other browsers.