@Mermotoso@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agoFaces of Homelessnesssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1814arrow-down19
arrow-up1805arrow-down1imageFaces of Homelessnesssh.itjust.works@Mermotoso@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareScrubbleslinkfedilinkEnglish24•1 month agoNo, reread what they said. Laws against employers requiring an address. Don’t be so quick to assume.
minus-square@officermike@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-12•1 month agoEven reading what they wrote, the context and intent were there, but the way it was written doesn’t align with their intent.
minus-square@Zorque@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish21•1 month agoIt’s pretty easy to infer what they meant based on context. Provided you’re trying to understand what they mean and not divorcing all intent from the words.
minus-square@wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish19•1 month agoBut if I can’t get upset at things someone clearly didn’t mean, why bother going online at all?
minus-square@Fermion@feddit.nllinkfedilink11•1 month agoNot to brag, but I can get angry without even reading comments these days.
minus-square@Soup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 month ago“It” means the huge hurdle. It could have been better, for sure, but it’s fine.
No, reread what they said. Laws against employers requiring an address. Don’t be so quick to assume.
Even reading what they wrote, the context and intent were there, but the way it was written doesn’t align with their intent.
It’s pretty easy to infer what they meant based on context. Provided you’re trying to understand what they mean and not divorcing all intent from the words.
But if I can’t get upset at things someone clearly didn’t mean, why bother going online at all?
Not to brag, but I can get angry without even reading comments these days.
“It” means the huge hurdle. It could have been better, for sure, but it’s fine.