@koulib@sh.itjust.works to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 months agoWhich new Protocol or Standard are you most excited about?message-square53fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up185arrow-down1message-squareWhich new Protocol or Standard are you most excited about?@koulib@sh.itjust.works to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square53fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDomilinkfedilink2•2 months agoECH is intended for privacy, not for circumventing censorship. If the next TLS version enforces ECH, plaintext SNI will die out at some point on its own.
minus-square@khorovodoved@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•2 months agoIntensions do not metter in this case. It can be used for that and that’s enough. If you block any connections that use ECH (by blocking cloudflare-ech for example) users will have no choice but to fallback to unencrypted CH.
ECH is intended for privacy, not for circumventing censorship.
If the next TLS version enforces ECH, plaintext SNI will die out at some point on its own.
Intensions do not metter in this case. It can be used for that and that’s enough. If you block any connections that use ECH (by blocking cloudflare-ech for example) users will have no choice but to fallback to unencrypted CH.