• @liliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 months ago

    I would use the native version. For something like this, it makes sense that it should have less restricted/sandboxed access to the underlying system.

    • @deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      virt-manager only requires access to the libvirtd socket, as long as the flatpak.has that as default configuration (which I imagine would be the case), there’s zero difference beteween flatpak and native.

      • @deafboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        In my experience, this is not the case. It just says it can’t connect. Doesn’t specify how or where to.

      • @hellostick@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        actually there is difference in version between the two. deb by my distro is in 4.0.0 (mar, 2022) while flatpak is 5.0.0 (nov, 2024)

    • @hellostick@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      i am not sure which one is the native version… you mean the version packaged by the distro (deb) or the developer (flatpak)?