Serge Matveenko to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agoLegalEagle Suing PayPal's Honeyyoutu.bemessage-square205fedilinkarrow-up1889arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1878arrow-down1external-linkLegalEagle Suing PayPal's Honeyyoutu.beSerge Matveenko to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square205fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish-8•3 months agoWhy would being problematic to honey hurt them? If anything, it’d make the other sponsors more confident in their affiliate links. They’ve burnt plenty of brides with Apple and Nvidia, I don’t see why they would be afraid of honey.
minus-square@DasAlbatross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish25•3 months agoWhy would publicly burning an advertiser on their channel cause other advertisers to be reluctant to work worth them? Could be any reason.
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish0•3 months agoThey’ve had public spats with Anchor and Plex, doesn’t seem to have hurt them too much. I don’t see how honey is more dangerous to them.
minus-square@brbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoAbout to entirely make something up Maybe there are 10 more advertisers they want to rip on but they already felt two was too many IDK!
minus-square@kux@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish6•3 months ago burnt plenty of brides exceptionally good typo
Why would being problematic to honey hurt them? If anything, it’d make the other sponsors more confident in their affiliate links. They’ve burnt plenty of brides with Apple and Nvidia, I don’t see why they would be afraid of honey.
Why would publicly burning an advertiser on their channel cause other advertisers to be reluctant to work worth them?
Could be any reason.
They’ve had public spats with Anchor and Plex, doesn’t seem to have hurt them too much. I don’t see how honey is more dangerous to them.
About to entirely make something up
Maybe there are 10 more advertisers they want to rip on but they already felt two was too many
IDK!
exceptionally good typo