• deaf_fish
    link
    fedilink
    -53 months ago

    Do you think corpos wouldn’t unalive people to increase their profits?

      • deaf_fish
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        Looking at how badly I am getting down voted, I am afraid to say anything too controversial. I have probably been reported several times for being correct.

    • @frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s not what you said

      You said a company would threaten someone’s family to force them to work for that company. I am not aware of any time in recent history that a company has done this.

      Obviously a large corporation would kill people and they do.

      • deaf_fish
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Do you need specific threats or will just the threat of death due exposure and or starving death because you can’t pay for food or shelter?

        • @kerrigan778@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I don’t know, only you can know your own integrity. Are some people homeless or hungry or both because there are things they won’t do for money though? Yes, of course.

          • deaf_fish
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            So you would be ok with your family starving because you won’t work for military corporation? If true I admire your dedication, but I couldn’t do go through with it.

        • @frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          For your statements to make sense, it need to driven by a specific actor not the system as a whole. Ie, yes, a specific threat.

          • deaf_fish
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            Hmm, I haven’t found any historical examples of specific threats against families. I am a bit surprised, if they are willing to kill workers, why not also threaten their families?

            Also my statement was corpos in general. So it was a systemic argument.