• @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -55
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You’re all ghouls. Each and every one of you who revels in this. Ironically, that’s exactly what you claim his crime was.

    I’m ashamed and embarrassed to be associated with you miserable wretches who would glorify murder to sate your revenge fantasies. You have no shame.

    None of you know anything about this man aside from his occupation. You’re all hateful, ignorant, self-righteous assholes.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      204 months ago

      None of you know anything about this man aside from his occupation.

      Would you defend an Auschwitz guard using the same argument?

      • @nnullzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        184 months ago

        More like a Goebbels level than a guard. Guard would be like a customer service agent. The CEO was way more involved than that.

      • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        -20
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes, if he was shot in the back with a silenced gun while leaving his hotel at 645am.

        There is no justice in that.

            • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              16
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              randos

              How was this a rando? They premeditated killing this rando?

              But - a lot (most/all?) of social rights we have now were achieved exactly like that. When protesting fails, politicians don’t step in (or are defending the corporations), something at some point brakes.
              You know, the guillotine story. And they invented that when corporations/wealthy families had much less wealth concentrated than today.

              Then we get system changes like actual effective healthcare. The ugly historical truth is only violence gets noticed & harder to hide. And it’s not like the next CEO won’t be very aware of what happened to his predecessor.

              • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                -114 months ago

                No… killing CEOs has not produced effective social change at any point. The thing about it is that they’re just going to appoint someone else. It literally makes no difference for the system, they have plenty of volunteers for the job. There won’t be any change in business, they’ll just hire a security detail.

                • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  94 months ago

                  This is exactly it - we are taught words work, but in reality that is just so that violence can be condemned when it happens to important people.

                  And no, people eventually stop working for a monarchy that goes through one king per year.

              • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                -104 months ago

                What if he was targeted because he was going to do something that was good but unprofitable? Did you ever think about that?

                • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Are you defending a CEO of an American Health insurance company on the astronomically small chance he would give a pittance anything that would help anyone?

                  Fuck dude, That’s a weak ass strawman.

                  Take a moment and go look the dude up and what his company has done under his direction.

                  Stop simping for thise who would charge you for life saving healthcare.

                  • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -44 months ago

                    Again, you can’t simp for a dead man. I’m just asking for people to not glorify his death like some kind of sick trophy. It’s disgusting.

          • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            -44 months ago

            How? What was his crime? Is an anonymous masked man really your judge juror and executioner? That system makes sense to you?

            • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              11
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Are you unfamiliar with how the American health system works and how loose the definition of justice is?

              • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                -8
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Not at all. That’s also irrelevant. You’re happy about something that is very wrong. I don’t know what else to say.

    • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      You’re all ghouls. Each and every one of you who revels in this. Ironically, that’s exactly what you claim his crime was.

      Nah, its kinda like celebrating the death of any mass murderer. Doesn’t make one a ghoul to celebrate one less evil person on the planet.

    • @DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      94 months ago

      None of you know anything about this man aside from his occupation.

      I mean that’s kind of the point, right?

    • Ellen_musk_ox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      Curious for you to explain why you see it as “revenge”?

      That term seems to imply that Thompson had caused harm of some sort.

      Care to help me understand better?

      • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        That term seems to imply that Thompson had caused harm of some sort.

        He is directly responsible for anyone with United as insurance dying due to denied care.

        • Ellen_musk_ox
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 months ago

          I agree. I was challenging OP’s offence to the attitudes expressed.

          It’s stereotypical liberalism. One that says we can vocally criticize a private institution but not actually act against it. And we must deplore any actions against that private institution.