Elon Musk’s latest changes for X are driving more users away – not exactly a surprise, granted – and many of them are flocking to rival social media outlet Bluesky. So many made the switch, in fact, it led to Bluesky briefly going down due to the volume of incoming new users.

The central move initiated by X that made the headlines for driving migration away from Musk’s platform is a change to the way the ‘Block’ button works. This was actually announced back in September, but is officially being implemented now (well, it’ll be in place ‘soon’ we’re told).

It means that going forward, X users who you have blocked will still be able to view your (public) posts – though they won’t be able to engage with them in any way (from replies to liking and so forth).

This is problematic for obvious reasons, in terms of enabling stalkers and trolls who will still be able to view the posts of an account that has blocked them, when previously this wasn’t the case. In the past, blocking meant that the blocked user couldn’t see any posts (or anything at all, save for a message telling them that they’ve been blocked), but soon, this will change.

Bluesky posted to say it had in excess of 100,000 new users inside 12 hours following the announcement by X, after the rival network highlighted the fact that its block function stops those who are blocked from viewing any posts.

In an update, Bluesky noted that it has now gained half a million new users in the past day.

There’s another reason that some folks are rapidly exiting from X stage left (and right, and indeed center, clambering over the audience, it would seem), and that’s a change to X’s privacy policy.

As TechCrunch reports, the new policy includes an update that allows third-party collaborators to use content on X to train their AI models – unless the user opts out. This is a notable extension of the reach of AI training on X, which has so far only been used to train Musk’s own Grok AI (unless users opt out, again).

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 month ago

    Just helpful to remember, as all this horseshit persists, Bluesky is Jack Dorsey. Dorsey is former head of Twitter and musk’s good buddy.

    It’s all a losing proposition, whatever direction you move - except if you move… Away.

        • Prior_Industry
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 month ago

          But he’s left seemingly under a cloud, so unless the leadership changes I doubt he’s influencing decision making.

          Let’s be honest these social media platforms will be a rinse and repeat. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts. Move on when the ownership go full Elon.

      • @Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        So he’s completely removed from anything to do with that company and isn’t inherently woven into the DNA as it’s very recent founder?

    • @Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      I dunno. I’d say it’s more important to see what exactly he’s doing and what Bluesky is.

      Right now Bluesky is really good. So until it turns bad I’m sticking to it.

        • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          i know. but its our responsability to understand why the corporate shitty options are always preferred by the layman public.

          • @Snapz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Because we are extremely simple and self obsessed animals on the whole. At the intersection of those two things, we regularly conflate base familiarity with earned trust. A bit of a narcissistic drive to tell ourselves that… if WE know about something, it MUST be good, otherwise we wouldn’t have taken the time to first learn about it!

            It’s why your town is currently infested with candidate signs in every public space. It’s also why incumbents have such large advantages in elections and why dead/convicted politicians (or Last-name sharing family members of those politicians) are often elected after the fact.