• Omega
    link
    fedilink
    831 year ago

    Border control is literally federal jurisdiction. It’s weird that they didn’t just say that.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      551 year ago

      5-4 vote, I wonder what the four’s reasoning was.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 year ago

        Partisanship. pure and simple.

        the five voted- appropriately- as the supremacy clause has already answered the question.

        • Kool_Newt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          281 year ago

          They’re extremely consistent in their actual reasons. It’s their stated reasons that vary depending on their political needs.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          No one provided any explantion for their vote.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This story is about the Supreme Court’s en banc decision on the application for certiorari, on appeal from the court below which I believe was the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit tossed the district court’s order finding in favor of Texas. The denial of certiorari is the explanation, it means they agree with the reasoning and analysis of the Fifth Circuit. It’s very rare for a denial of certiorari to have any commentary.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Ohhh the lower court. “Court below” kind of threw me.

              Still, the SCOTUS vote on cert was 5-4 against. Four of them voted for cert, and while that was not the thing I was initially asking about, I do wonder about why they did.