Response from Martin Woodward, GitHub’s VP of Developer Relations:

Sorry for the inconvenience @koepnick - while searching across all repos has required being logged in for a long time, when we enhanced the search capabilities earlier in the 2023 we had to extend this to repos as well (see https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-07-code-search-now-requires-login/).

This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.

  • @treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    It’s okay. We need to move some shit off GH anyway. They’re basically a monopoly on FLOSS code.

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ok. But alternatives exist and users have choice. If Github fucks up tomorrow, a user exodus can be triggered just like that. It’s not too hard to migrate from it.

          Plus the open source code space is vast. Huge. And the means of distributing it are quite diverse.

      • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah? When was the last time you clicked on a “Source Code” link and got anything other than a link to GitHub or a direct download of a tarball?

        Sure, alternatives exist – I could name half a dozen right now – but no one uses 'em.

        • @nyan@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I run into the occasional Gitlab-hosted project. Problem is, Gitlab’s equally obnoxious in its own way.

          • trashcan
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Lemmy even uses github.

            Think about that for a moment.