☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agoChina has grown more new forest cover than any nation on Earthmedia.mas.toimagemessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down164file-text
arrow-up179arrow-down1imageChina has grown more new forest cover than any nation on Earthmedia.mas.to☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square74fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink12•2 years agoI am always happy to hear about reforestation, but has somebody understood out of which source the numbers from china are coming? I mean they are sometimes quite the enthusiasts talking about their successes
minus-square@stifle867@programming.devlinkfedilink-1•2 years agoHere’s your source https://youtu.be/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op
minus-square@PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksBlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
minus-square@zerfuffle@lemmy.mllinkfedilink-4•2 years agoprogramming.dev back at it with the shit takes
minus-square@zerfuffle@lemmy.mllinkfedilink-4•2 years agoIt’s not like forest cover is hard to verify by satellite imagery. Lying about reforestation and deforestation is hard.
minus-square@stifle867@programming.devlinkfedilink3•edit-22 years agoThe satellite imagery shows a net loss compared to CCP figures which show a net gain. China lies more easily than it tells the truth.
minus-square@zerfuffle@lemmy.mllinkfedilink7•2 years agoYou don’t provide sources, so here are some that directly contradict your claim: CAS: https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/mutimedia_news/202203/t20220322_302792.shtml UNESCO: http://www.unesco-hist.org/index.php?r=en/article/info&id=1714 Journal of Geophysical Research: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022JG007101 Remote Sensing: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/13/2592 International Journal of Remote Sensing: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431161.2021.2022804 International Journal of Digital Earth: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2023.2190625 Where are your sources?
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPlinkfedilink-25•2 years agoyou managed to fit so much seething and coping into a single comment
I am always happy to hear about reforestation, but has somebody understood out of which source the numbers from china are coming? I mean they are sometimes quite the enthusiasts talking about their successes
Here’s your source https://youtu.be/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
programming.dev back at it with the shit takes
It’s not like forest cover is hard to verify by satellite imagery. Lying about reforestation and deforestation is hard.
The satellite imagery shows a net loss compared to CCP figures which show a net gain. China lies more easily than it tells the truth.
You don’t provide sources, so here are some that directly contradict your claim:
CAS: https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/mutimedia_news/202203/t20220322_302792.shtml
UNESCO: http://www.unesco-hist.org/index.php?r=en/article/info&id=1714
Journal of Geophysical Research: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022JG007101
Remote Sensing: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/13/2592
International Journal of Remote Sensing: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431161.2021.2022804
International Journal of Digital Earth: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2023.2190625
Where are your sources?
you managed to fit so much seething and coping into a single comment