Not white, but for my part I absolutely would not. Not in my vocabulary.

If someone else did, though, there are way better uses of my time and energy than wagging my finger and giving them a sanctimonious lecture about it.

Every time.

But for how long?

Man, you’re quick. Multitasking over there- looking up references because you feel defensive, going back to my week old comments to post your cute takes.

Maybe… find something useful to do, guy. I’m going to block you, I think, just so that you’re not tempted to waste so much of your very important time on me. You could be using that time to find more ways to keep being part of the problem.

Of course you don’t. You’re a kid.

Don’t worry. The democrats will blow their advantage like they have without fail for a half-century- and you’ll still have the far-right around for you to play centrist with. 😘

Hey, Americans- just as an encore, go dig up Charlie Kirk and shoot him again.

I think he’s glitched out halfway between 1) trying to figure out something outrageous enough to say that would seem proportional to the electoral blowout, and 2) his simple-ass programming that defaults to “winners are good”

I hope he has a fucking stroke the next time he goes to honk out a dirt snake

And Fark!

Sucks to anon’s ass-mar

I doubt we’ll ever fully be rid of them.

When have you ever TRIED to get rid of them?

You outnumber the police and you’re armed to the teeth. “The US military would just crush the population” argument is not particularly convincing either. You assume the military is some perfectly unified, ruthlessly efficient machine, which doesn’t describe the US military in foreign wars, let alone a domestic one.

Even the shitty GOP is unwilling to tolerate prolonged ground wars, casualties, recruitment problems, political backlash, and occupations of populations that are actually hostile to it. Yet somehow we are supposed to believe that the same institution would suddenly function flawlessly whe turned against your own citizens? The assumption that everyone would simply follow orders indefinitely while Americans were being killed in huge numbers is absurd. There’s a reason you haven’t sent soldiers in to occupy Tehran.

Eventually they would run into a very simple problem- if armed resistance was genuinely widespread, half-measures would not settle it. It would either have to escalate to levels of violence sufficient to kill Americans on an enormous scale, potentially millions, or it would have to back down / simply stop functioning. You also have the fact that your military has never been more poorly managed than it is right now.

Yes, the US military has vastly more firepower than civilians. Congratulations. Nobody disputes that. The question is whether it could politically, institutionally, and psychologically use that firepower against its own population on the scale necessary to win such a conflict- and if it’s your position that your own military WOULD do that to you, and that is why you are choosing not to act? Great- then your political morality is just one in which the government’s entitlement to your obedience increases in direct proportion to how willing it is to fucking kill you.

deleted by creator

No, your response to 9/11 fucked up your momentum.

I lived in the states at that time, and back then, there was a widespread sense that bigotry was something society was supposed to be overcoming rather than something people could openly embrace as political identities.

YES, of course, the 90s were absolutely full of bigotry, and marginalized groups had fewer legal protections. But speaking as a person of color, there was absolutely a prevailing sense, at least in mainstream culture, that society was moving toward greater acceptance and equality. Racism and homophobia were things to be embarrassed about, and media reflected that optimism everywhere- tons of boundary-pushing and inclusion that makes 2026’s pop culture look as straight, white, and cis as can be- and there was no social media to amplify the relatively few voices who thought they should complain about that fact.

Back then, progress felt like an inevitability. We argued about how quickly we’d get there, but there was a general expectation that society would keep moving forward. Today, the US can’t even take the direction of that movement for granted, let alone the progress itself.

I’ll take the 90s’ “casual bigotry + optimism” over the outright Nazi shit and utter cowardice displayed by those who refuse to fight back today.

Wrong verb

Suicidal people who don’t take at least one fascist with them? World is better off without them anyway.

Sure, but we’ve already established that you lack self awareness, so…

I’m dead fucking serious.

Every American is falling all over themselves to make excuses for everything they have to lose if they lift a finger to fight back.

Some people have very little to lose and are still doing fuck all.

Explain this.

This looks like a poster for a B-tier A24 movie