• venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Politicians should be banned from stock market. Total conflict of interest.

      • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        if we keep electing people trying to maintain the status quo, then it’ll never happen

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s a catch-22. To get elected, you need to learn to manipulate within the system. Once elected, you know how to leverage the system, so why would you change it?

          The best chance we’ll have for systemic change will come when boomers die off. That shouldn’t discourage efforts today, but impart some hope for the future.

          • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            I want to believe that the most change will happens when boomers are gone, but I don’t trust that the new era of politicians won’t get caught up in the game.

      • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

        What does that mean?

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          It wasn’t put to a vote after being read aloud on two separate introductions. It was then forwarded to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee where it went to die.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              If they see value in the bill they can mandate a vote. That was over six months ago, so I wouldn’t hold my breath.

              • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                they’re probably all sucking the teat one way or another, even at the lowest levels.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d be fine if they were allowed to invest in things like mutual funds so that they could take advantage of the market without being able to do insider trading of a specific stock.

      • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        that would be better, but they could still invest in specific sectors or industries.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yep, and maybe that’s somewhat acceptable, but we could also confine it to diversified mutual funds meeting specific criteria.

          Edit: confine, not congratulations