• @vanZuider@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    492 years ago

    Don’t call it “accidental database deletion”. Call it “unannounced live exercise of backup procedure”.

    • Saluki
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Either that or rapid exodus from the country

  • Jeena
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    I did something like that once, I wasn’t very good at SQL but I needed some data, so I logged in into the production database and run my SELECT queries, I didn’t change anything so everything was good, or so I thought.

    I created a cross product over tables with millions of entries and when it didn’t respond I thought it was odd but it was time to go home anyway. On the way home they called me and asked what I did. They had to restart the DB server because once the cache timed out one application after another started failing.

  • @azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Ouch. Gotta wrap those deletes in a transaction and look before it rolls forward. Lessons learned. Time to see if the backups actually have any data on them.

    • EmasXP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      As a side note, DBeaver actually asks for confirmation if it thinks you are about to do something wonky. I think it’s quite telling just how common this mistake is. We’ve all been there

      • @marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Update and delete should require a where clause. You can always use true or 1 = 1, the gain from omitting it is minimal.

        The fact that no DBMS ever decided to implement this, not even as an option is quite distressing.

  • nighty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Sometimes I dream of getting fired for accidentally doing shit like this. Sweet relief…

    • @Dasnap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Good companies wouldn’t fire someone for this because:

      1. There should be processes in place to prevent this, or recover from this, anyway. It’s a team/department failure and you would just be the straw that broke the camel’s back.

      2. They now know you’ve experienced this and will hopefully know to never do it again. Bringing in someone else could just reintroduce the issue.